MARKET INTELLIGENCE

Market Opportunity Assessment

Structured market sizing and feasibility analysis that answers the foundational question: is this market worth the investment? TAM/SAM/SOM quantification, demand-supply modelling, trade flow mapping, and evidence-based go/no-go frameworks grounded in 23 years of advisory practice.

Markets · Pillar i of ii · Market Opportunity Assessment Related: Competitive Intelligence
02The Practice

Three lenses on a single question.

Market opportunity reads differently depending on who is asking. The investor sees capital. The operator sees execution. The board sees defensibility. The assessment that survives all three is the one worth acting on.

i.Investor

Capital and conviction

$2.4M

The average cost of a market entry that never should have been approved.

Deloitte · Market Entry Practice, 2024

Capital committed under the wrong assumptions rarely returns. Five questions worth answering before the cheque is written.

  1. Sizing

    Is the addressable market verifiable, not just plausible? Triangulation from customs, industry, and consumption data — verified at source, never extrapolated from headlines.

  2. Returns

    What does the conservative scenario actually look like? Financial feasibility tested across optimistic, base, and downside paths.

  3. Timing

    How long until cash flow inflects? Trigger points for reassessment defined, not aspirational.

  4. Risk

    What are the consequential downside scenarios? Political, regulatory, and infrastructure exposure mapped with confidence intervals.

  5. Liquidity

    Is the exit path mapped or imagined? Secondary market depth, strategic-acquirer landscape, and reversal cost all surfaced before commitment.

ii.Operator

Execution and access

18mo

Median time from board approval to first revenue when market entry was assumption-led.

Dromley Advisory · Operator Practice

Execution is where the thesis meets the ground. Five questions about whether the engine can actually run.

  1. Access

    What regulatory approvals gate revenue? Registration pathways, certification timelines, and non-tariff barriers identified before kick-off.

  2. Channels

    Does distribution infrastructure actually exist? Channel partner availability, route-to-market economics, and local-content obligations made explicit.

  3. Talent

    Who runs this on the ground? Senior local hires, expatriate dependency, and succession risk addressed up front.

  4. Supply

    Can production scale with demand? Capacity utilisation, input dependency, and import lead-times stress-tested against the demand model.

  5. Cost

    What’s the unit economics at production scale? Landed cost, fully-loaded margins, and the breakeven volume known before market entry, not after.

iii.Board

Strategy and defensibility

42%

Of market entries underperform projections, most because the assessment was wrong before execution began.

McKinsey · State of Market Entry, 2024

The board is accountable for the conviction. Five questions a defensible recommendation has to answer.

  1. Fit

    Does this market sit inside the strategic perimeter? Adjacency to current operations, capability transfer, and portfolio coherence demonstrated.

  2. Risk

    What is the consequential loss case? Worst-credible downside quantified, not just probability-weighted base case.

  3. Governance

    Can the recommendation withstand audit? Source-traced deliverables, named methodology, and critical assumptions surfaced for review.

  4. Reputation

    Does failure here damage adjacent markets? Spillover into existing customer relationships, regulator standing, and brand permission examined.

  5. Optionality

    What does reversal cost if the market doesn’t develop? Exit pathway costed, contractual commitments mapped, and irreversible spend identified.

03The Method

The work, made explicit.

The analytical frameworks we apply, the sources we triangulate, the deliverables you receive, and the phases the work moves through. Nothing concealed in the methodology. The audit trail is part of the work.

We don’t size markets. We build evidence that survives scrutiny.

Dromley · Methodology Statement
Frameworks
  • TAM/SAM/SOM
  • Porter’s Five Forces
  • PESTEL
  • Build/Buy/Partner
  • Scenario modeling
Sources Triangulated

Customs & trade data verifies industry reports. Government statistics anchor demand modeling. Bloomberg and Reuters terminals supply financial benchmarks. Primary research (expert interviews, channel checks) tests claims that desk research alone cannot. All triangulated against the proprietary advisory record.

Deliverables

Sizing model with assumptions documented. Industry attractiveness assessment. Entry-mode recommendation. Financial feasibility model (three scenarios). Risk register. Board-ready go/no-go with confidence intervals.

Timeline

8–12 wks

Engagement Phases
  1. i.Scope
  2. ii.Investigate
  3. iii.Synthesize
  4. iv.Recommend
04The Discipline

What this work commits to, and what it equips you to decide.

The scope of this engagement, and the decisions its outputs are built to support. Held together, they define the work.

The Scope

Is: investment-decision evidence.

Not: a literature review.

Is: feasibility tested under uncertainty.

Not: marketing strategy.

Is: a defensible go/no-go.

Not: a competitive scan.

Is: a sized, sourced, modelled answer.

Not: a sector primer.

The work either holds the scope and equips the decision, or it is not yet the work.

The Decisions

Enter or skip.

The go/no-go question, answered with sized market evidence and risk-adjusted feasibility, not opinion.

When to enter.

The timing window, modelled against competitor moves, regulatory shifts, and capital availability.

How to enter.

Build, buy, or partner: chosen against operational feasibility, not preference.

What to fund.

Capital allocation tied to scenario survival. The number that holds across all three paths.

What to monitor.

The leading indicators that would change the call: defined at delivery, tracked after.

What to walk away from.

The conditions that would reverse the recommendation. Built in, not retrofitted.

Reading the market opportunity.

Dromley reads markets as architectures of decision, not as forecasts of growth. The first read is for the seams: where capital flow would meet operational reality.

The second is for the assumptions hiding as if they were facts. The third is for the conditions that would reverse the recommendation before it’s signed.

Findings hold across all three readings, or return to scope. That is the practice, applied here: the sizing is not the work; the sized model is. The recommendation is not the deliverable; the defended recommendation is.

Ready to Orchestrate Omnichannel Excellence?

Transform fragmented digital operations into integrated strategy that drives measurable business outcomes across your entire ecosystem

REQUEST STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT